Archive for November, 2009

The On-going Walkway Closure Debate

At the Nov 14th City Council meeting, three walkway closure petitions were on the agenda. It seems that there are closure petitions on almost every Council agenda these days (two new ones coming forward on Nov 30th) and if you attend the meetings you will likely hear the same debate being replayed over and over.

Currently, once a petition has been filed, residents surrounding the walkway are petitioned (generally by mail) for a yes or no to the walkway closure. In order to be considered for closure 80% of the surrounding residents must be in agreement – residents who do not respond to the petition are counted as being in favour of the closure. Should the closure guidelines be met, public notice of the closure hearing is given and it eventually comes before City Council for debate. There is a $1,000 application fee and a $1,000 land purchase fee for those looking to close the walkway.

In a few cases (lately centered on Ward 3), the closure involves a walkway that leads to nowhere and the final decision by Council makes perfect senses. Others have the full support of the area residents. However, a good number of these closure hearings quickly turn More >

Lake Placid comes up short – again

Just heard word back from a couple sources who were able to attend Executive Committee this afternoon.

Top of the agenda was discussion around a report from Administration with regards to the way forward on Parcel “Y” – better known as the (former) Lake Placid development.

Mr. Lobsinger of Lake Placid Developments confirmed to Committee that he has still not received his financing, despite assurances to the contrary last week at City Council and afterwards in the media scrum (story here).  He once again cautioned Councillors that sending the process back to the beginning and issuing another Request For Proposal would result in a long delay for any shovels being put in the ground at Parcel “Y”.

Several Councillors spoke to moving ahead ASAP, including Councillors Penner, Wyant, and Heidt. Councillor Clark spoke on the potential opportunity being presented to the City to take a fresh look at what is intended for Parcel “Y”, while Councillor Paulsen suggested engaging the local development community (those not interested in developing Parcel “Y”) to see what the City could do to open up the zoning to make things more palatable for potential developers.

No decision was made on how to proceed with the future of Parcel “Y” and More >